lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH] IDE Power Management try 1

On 25 Apr 2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> > If you add REQ_DRIVE_INTERNAL, and kill the other ones I mentioned, fine
> > with me then.
> >
> > rq->flags & REQ_DRIVE_INTERNAL
> > rq->cmd[0] == PM
> > pm stuf
> > rq->cmd[0] = taskfile
> > taskfile
> >
> > etc. Make sense?
>
> As I just wrote, I'd rather go the whole way then and break up flags
> (which is a very bad name btw) into req_type & req_subtype, though
> that would mean a bit of driver fixing....
>
> Ben.

req_type & req_subtype makes sense,
but it is future since driver work is needed

--
Bartlomiej

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:1.705 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site