![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On top of which, if a buffer overflow is found, the exploit will run in > the context of the signed program. Two examples I can think of right now: 1. Manipulated 007 save games files can subvert the Xbox when they overflow the trusted game. 2. The "hack resistant" series 2 Tivo boxes can be subverted by a insecure, signed Linux kernel. The Tivo kernel is signed with ElGamal, and the Tivo firmware will refuse to run a non-signed kernel and initrd image. The initrd image has SHA1 hashes of all the bootup config files, binaries and and a hash checker. The idea here is that Tivo can control what is executed. Turns out Tivo signed a kernel+initrd that wasn't locked down properly. Oops! This kernel+initrd package has become a hot commodity. The pieces that come together are: 1. All directories/files are verified EXCEPT stuff on /var - However, none of the hash checked boot scripts reference anything on /var 2. Users can control what command line is passed to the kernel 3. Users can put the Tivo hard drive in a PC and put stuff on /var. Finally, Tivo didn't validate/scrub the kernel command line properly, and people were able to get their own daemons and code running, stored on /var, by passing BASH_ENV with a funky value to the kernel. Dax Kelson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||