![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Alan Cox wrote: >On Iau, 2003-04-24 at 16:37, Timothy Miller wrote: > > >>You are free to make a fork of the Linux tree for which DRM is NOT ok. >> >>Likewise, Linus is free to allow or disallow whatever he feels like in >>HIS tree. >> >> > >Actually no. > >Either its allowed by the GPL or its not. There are good reasons to >think that may ways of doing it are not (The GPL defines source >as including installation instructions). However thats a debate for >lawyers, and you can have the debate as long as you like but it doesn't >change what the GPL says.. > > > > > Certainly. But say the GPL allows it, and say Linus decides he wants it. There's nothing stopping someone else from forking it and deciding they'll never accept any DRM-related code into their fork. Now, here's something for the lawyers to try to do: determine that the GPL _requires_ DRM. :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||