lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromRusty Russell <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Oopses in apply_alternatives
DateThu, 24 Apr 2003 13:12:10 +1000
In message <20030423213038.GA6389@vana.vc.cvut.cz> you write:
> Hi Rusty,>   I somehow missed apply_alternatives inclusion into the kernel, so
> I have no idea whether you are right person...
> 
>   It is not good idea to call apply_alternatives from module_finalize,
> as apply_alternatives is __init function... It spectaculary crashed

Smells of Torvaldism.  I missed it too: you're right,
apply_alternatives should be marked

	__init_or_module

instead.

Thanks!
Rusty.

> @@ -802,7 +802,7 @@>     APs have less capabilities than the boot processor are not handled. 
> 
>     In this case boot with "noreplacement". */ 
> -void __init apply_alternatives(void *start, void *end) 
> +void apply_alternatives(void *start, void *end) 
>  { 
>  	struct alt_instr *a; 
>  	int diff, i, k;

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:34    [from the cache]
©2003-2008