lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <>
SubjectRE: [patch] printk subsystems
DateMon, 21 Apr 2003 22:09:18 -0700
> From: Karim Yaghmour [mailto:karim@opersys.com]
> 
> "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" wrote:
>
> > Not meaning to be an smartass here, but I don't buy the "lockless" tag,
> > I would agree it is an optimized-lock scheme ....
> >
> > Although it is not that important, no need to make a fuss out of that :)
> 
> I actually think this is important.

Don't get me wrong - I don't mean the actual difference is not important;
what I mean is not important is me buying the "lockless" tag or not. I 
actually think that the method you guys use is really sharp.

Iñaky Pérez-González -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own
(and my fault)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:34    [from the cache]
©2003-2008