[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.68 Fix IO_APIC IRQ assignment bug
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Mika Penttilä wrote:

> Why can't we use the same vector for multiple ioapic entrys? After all,
> we are already sharing irqs, and an irq is just a cookie for a vector.

IIRC, there are serious issues with using the same vector for multiple
I/O APIC interrupts, at least for certain implementations. So it's
probably not even worth investigating.

+ Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland +
+ e-mail:, PGP key available +

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.062 / U:1.480 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site