lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 67-mjb2 vs 68-mjb1 (sdet degredation)
> Yeah, that fixes it. Ho hum ... I wonder if we can find something that
> works well for both cases? I guess the options would be:
>
> 1. Some way to make the rwlock mechanism itself faster.
> 2. Try to fix the contention itself somehow for this instance.
>
> Not sure if 1 is fundamentally futile or not, but would obviously be
> better (more general) if it's possible ;-)

Hmmm. Actually seems like more of a "which test you pick" thing than a
machine thing. Maybe it's the balance of read / write accesses to the
rwlock that matters, or something.

time dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1 count=1M

with backout:

real 0m4.302s
user 0m0.900s
sys 0m3.370s

With patch:

real 0m4.016s
user 0m0.810s
sys 0m3.200s

So the patch helps that test at least.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.054 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site