Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:53:55 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [CHECKER] 6 memory leaks |
| |
William Lee Irwin III wrote : >> I'm in terror. ASSERT()? return NULL in a macro argument? >> Any chance of cleaning that up a bit while you're at it?
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 01:27:28PM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > Rather than fixing imaginary non-existing bugs, I prefer to > spend my time fixing real bugs that byte real users. This construct is > perfectly sound and valid, and it needs to be done in this way, the > only issue is that someone should rename "ASSERT" into "IRDA_ASSERT".
The construct is a Lovecraftian horror. I've already lost my lunch once over extremely disgusting code today, and I don't care to intentionally read or run IRDA code ever again.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |