[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    SubjectRe: 2.5.67-ac2 and lilo
    Hey Andries,

    before taking your message into account, i think you misunderstood my

    > Hmm. You did not forget to rerun LILO or so?

    the error occurs when _running_ lilo, i.e. after typing "lilo" at the prompt.

    greetings, chris

    --- Andries Brouwer <> wrote:
    > > but now, when running lilo, i get the following message:
    > >
    > > Fatal: First boot sector doesn't have a valid LILO signature
    > Hmm. You did not forget to rerun LILO or so?
    > If ide_xlate_1024 does nothing but "return 0" then
    > handle_ide_mess() does nothing.
    > What other differences does -ac2 have?
    > It reintroduces a bug in the partition reading code - the fragment
    > @@ -456,7 +556,7 @@
    > if (!subtypes[n].parse)
    > continue;
    > subtypes[n].parse(state, bdev, START_SECT(p)*sector_size,
    > - NR_SECTS(p)*sector_size, slot);
    > + NR_SECTS(p)*sector_size, n);
    > }
    > put_dev_sector(sect);
    > of the -ac2 patch is bad.
    > In order to judge whether it is this or something else I would have
    > to know much more about your system. What are the kernel boot messages
    > for this disk under 2.5.67-bk9 that works and 2.5.67-ac2 that fails?
    > What is the partition table? No disk managers in sight? Does LILO
    > have lba32 or linear options?
    > Does 2.5.67-ac2 work if you replace its fs/partitions/msdos.c by
    > the vanilla one?
    > Andries

    Do you Yahoo!?
    Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.020 / U:8.632 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site