[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [TRIVIAL] kstrdup (Richard B. Johnson)  wrote on 18.04.03 in <Pine.LNX.4.53.0304181512220.22901@chaos>:

    > The test for every byte transferred is, quite obviously, correct.
    > It is also, quite obviously, non optimum.

    Actually, that is very much not obvious.

    Especially if you're familiar with architectures where every move has an
    implicit test (typically for zero and sign), and so checking for the zero
    byte during the move is quite obviously the only sane thing to do - the
    version with a count is slower, because the inner loop does more. (Those
    architectures typically don't have a REP-style prefix.)

    MfG Kai
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.019 / U:30.220 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site