Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept? | | From | Alan Cox <> | | Date | 19 Apr 2003 16:29:36 +0100 |
| |
On Sad, 2003-04-19 at 17:04, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > after shooting down one of this bloody cute new very-big-and-poor IDE drives > today I wonder whether it would be a good idea to give the linux-fs (namely my > preferred reiser and ext2 :-) some fault-tolerance. I remember there have been > some discussions along this issue some time ago and I guess remembering that it > was decided against because it should be the drivers issue to give the fs a > clean space to live, right?
Sometimes disks just go bang. They seem to do it distressingly more often nowdays which (while handy for criminals and pirates) is annoying for the rest of us. Putting magic in the file system to handle this is hard to do well, and at best you get things like ext2/ext3 have now - the ability to recover data in the event of some corruption, unless you get into really fancy stff.
Buy IDE disks in pairs use md1, and remember to continually send the hosed ones back to the vendor/shop (and if they keep appearing DOA to your local trading standards/fair trading type bodies).
Perhaps someone should also start a scoreboard for people to report dead IDE drives by vendor ;)
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |