![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
In article <1050755240.3277.3.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> you wrote: > You are arguing over a 1 instruction, probably sub 1 clock scheduling > matter on a call which is not used on any fast or common path. If you > shaved 1 clock off the timer handling instead you'd make a lot more > difference.. i think he is arguing about the performance of strcpy vs. memcpy. Is the 1 instruction longer including the inlined code for those two? Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:34 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||