[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [TRIVIAL] kstrdup
    In message <> you write:
    > No, my point is that kstrdup() _itself_ just shouldn't be done. I don't
    > see it as being worthy of kernel support.

    parport, afs, intermezzo, sunrpc, md, sound and um have their own
    strdup variants. ecard.c (ARM), xtalk.c (ia64), ide.c, blkmtd.c
    (mtd), dlci.c (wan), parport (again), md (again), moctotek.c (usb),
    scsiglue.c (usb), super.c (affs), inode.c (nfs), and generic.c (proc)
    all open code it.

    Most of them use it multuple times.

    I think unifying the seven implementations, and over fifty uses, is a
    minor but worthwhile goal. It's not as widely used as it would be in
    userspace, but still...

    Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.017 / U:8.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site