![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Don Cohen wrote: > In part I agree. I would have preferred to make my change in one > place instead of one driver at a time. On the other hand, it seems to > me that some of these details are already spread around all the > drivers. For instance, why does every driver have to call > eth_type_trans? Could that be delayed for netif_rx ? > > I do think it's reasonable for a driver to test whether the upper > layers are ready to process another packet. I suggest that this > test be encapsulated into a new function that can be changed at the > cost of only recompiling all the drivers. Why not NAPI? That is the existing mechanism provided to let the upper layer feedback to the low-level driver system congestion information. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:34 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||