[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch for playing] Patch to support 4000 disks and maintain backward
    Why not use devlabel?  It's a small userspace app which maps symlinks to
    underlying disk names. It uses Page83/Page80 data to track the true
    locations of disks even if their hd/sd name changes and simply updates the
    symlink to point to the right place.

    devlabel to do list:
    - support multipath configs (if devlabel currently finds the same uuid on 2
    disks, it wont let you add a symlink to either)
    - utilize sysfs info (rather than using my user apps to get 83/80 info, just
    get it from sysfs)


    Some compatibility needs more code than other compatibility.
    The desired compatibility includes the following, much of which
    has been noted earlier in this thread, and some of which may
    need to wait for multipath I/O and other of which might be best
    provided by a volume manager:

    o It must be possible to switch between 2.4 and 2.5/6
    kernels without a given disk's name changing.

    o New 2.5/6 installations should se a clean disk naming
    scheme without historical cruft.

    o Removing or adding one disk should not affect the
    names of other disks. Ideally, moving a given disk
    from one place to another should not change its
    name. "The good news is that we repaired your
    disk. The bad news is that, due to the resulting
    name changes, your application thoroughly
    corrupted all of its data."

    o Adding or removing a FC or SCSI adapter should not
    affect the names of disks hanging off of other
    FC or SCSI controllers. Ideally, the name of
    a disk should not change when its FC or SCSI
    controller is moved from one slot to another.

    o Failures of or repairs to the FC fabric should
    not change the names of any of the disks (though
    a sufficiently thorough failure might make some
    of the disks unreachable).

    o Cluster nodes should ideally have the same name
    for a given disk. Extra credit, though greatly
    appreciated by anyone who has ever had to deal
    with a cluster where different nodes have different
    names for the same disk. ;-)

    Thanx, Paul

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.021 / U:95.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site