Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:24:33 +0200 (MEST) | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] M68k IDE updates |
| |
On 14 Apr 2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 10:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > Indeed. Ataris and Q40/Q60s have byteswapped IDE busses, but they expect > > on-disk data to be that way, for compatibility with e.g. TOS. > > Some designers need to be shot... > > What about optionally making fix_drive_id a platoform hook > (like it was, but with a reasonable default) to avoid clobbering > the common code with those #ifdefs ?
Yes, I already suggested that in my IDE patch for 2.4.x. But I was in a hurry, since I wanted to get m68k IDE working in 2.4.21.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |