Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:52:15 -0700 | | From | Dan Kegel <> | | Subject | Re: gcc-2.95 broken on PPC? |
| |
The Denkster wrote: >> However, bugs #1 (zlib.c) and #3 (div64.h) disappear if I compile >> my kernels with gcc-3.2.2 instead of 2.95.4, which is a strong >> indication that 2.95.4 is broken on PPC. Is this something that's > > This is speculation only. We use gcc-2.95.4 as part of our ELDK in > all of our projects, and a lot of people are using these tools, too. > We definitely see more problems with gcc-3.x compilers.
Hi Wolfgang, when you say you see more problems with gcc-3.x compilers, what is x? I'd understand if you saw problems with gcc-3.0.*, but I had hoped that gcc-3.2.2 would compile good kernels for ppc. (Me, I'm still using Montavista Linux 2.0's gcc-2.95.3 to build my ppc kernels, but am looking for an excuse to switch to gcc-3.2.* or gcc-3.3.*.) - Dan
-- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |