[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2

    On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, David Lang wrote:

    > The reason he gave back when the discussion was first started (months ago)
    > was that klibc is designed to be directly linked into programs, and it was
    > felt that this would not be possible with the GPL. In fact klibc was
    > adopted instead of dietlibc speceificly BECOUSE of the license.

    There is still the possibility to support multiple libc implementation, if
    you don't like dietlibc, you're still free to use klibc.

    > while you could add an additional clause to the GPL to allow it to be
    > linked into programs directly the I seriously doubt if the self appointed
    > 'GPL police' would notice the issue and would expect that fears on the
    > subject would limit it's use.

    Could we at least try to not let this degenerate into a flamewar? Thanks.

    bye, Roman

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.020 / U:0.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site