Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:36:01 -0800 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) |
| |
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:15:35 +0100 (MET) Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu> wrote:
| | On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: | > On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote: | > > I must have missed something here. What other 2 oopses are you | > > referring to? | > | > Quoting from your report: | > | > ==> Mar 1 13:35:44 midway kernel: Oops: 0002 | > | > This means oops counter is 2. So there were two oopses before with | > counter value 0 and 1. | | I just checked, this is not true (I could dig up the false source | of information if interested). It's error_code: no page found, | kernel-mode write fault. Sorry for the confusion :( | | > > As for closing bug reports because they are not reproducible... | > | > No. Not because it's not reproducible however because it's untrustable | > and bogus. Unless as I mentioned before ... please see above. Thanks! | | So this is also invalid ... Could you please send the 'objdump -S | fs/ntfs/inode.o' output? The __ntfs_init_inode part would be enough | also.
I'm glad that this little confusion is cleared up. I was about to correct it, but you beat me to it. However, such an oops counter could be useful...
-- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |