lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Delaying writes to disk when there's no need
Date
> If the memory does get written to again before the writeout timeout
> then yeah its used some cpu, memory, pci, etc that it didn't have
> to.

It will presumably also have filled the cache with the writeout data.

> > Ultimately its all a tradeoff. Do you write now, or do you hold off
> > and hope that you can throw away some of the writes because new stuff
> > will home in to overwrite them?
>
> Yes it is a tradeoff. Having an idle disk gives more weight to "write now".

Not necessarily. What if you are using a solid state disk which only
allows a relatively low number of re-write cycles? What if the disk
is spun down, and spinning it up uses a lot of power? On a laptop,
you don't necessarily want the disk spinning up just to write one
sector.

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site