Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:54:00 +0000 | From | Andrew Walrond <> | Subject | Re: small devfs patch for 2.5.65, plan to replace /sbin/hotplug |
| |
Sounds wonderful. Any downsides?
Andrew Walrond
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >>> Are you still considering smalldevfs for 2.6 inclusion? If not, then >>> I'd like to discuss with you (and Greg KH) the possibility of just >>> eliminating devfs entirely, and moving to a userspace version that is >>> driven entirely by /sbin/hotplug. >> >> >> >> You mean with something like this: >> http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2003/view_abstract.php?talk=94 >> :) >> > > Yep, that's the one. Sounds very simple and straightforward to me. The > most complex part will be defining some file structure to define the > user's desired naming policy to the agent that handles the hotplug events. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |