[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Bugs sitting in the NEW state for more than two weeks
    On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:37:21PM -0500, Stacy Woods wrote:
    > Murray J. Root wrote:
    > >On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 09:35:25AM -0500, Stacy Woods wrote:
    > >
    > >>There are 101 bugs sitting in the NEW state for more than 2 weeks
    > >>that don't appear to have any activity. 48 of these bugs are owned
    > >>by bugme-janitors which are good candidates for anyone to work on.
    > >>Please check the bugs for before working on them to see if they are
    > >>still available.
    > >>
    > Murray,
    > Bugs 389 and 413 show the "last update" date was March 12th which
    > dosen't fall
    > within the two week criteria. The search is done only on the "last
    > update" and
    > has nothing to do with severity. Since you added comments to those
    > bugs it set
    > the date then. I realize this is not a perfect system to list all bugs
    > that are truly
    > not being worked on, but hopefully it gets some bugs investigated
    > Especially the
    > ones owned by bugme-janitors.

    Thanks for the explanation - now I just need to find ways to add info to a
    bug report without affecting the "last updated" time - IRC memos to gregkh?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.028 / U:0.284 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site