Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 2 Mar 2003 09:13:38 +0100 | From | Matthias Schniedermeyer <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kernel source spellchecker |
| |
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:09:10AM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 07:02:00PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: > > My corrections file is up at http://www.kegel.com/spell-fix-dan1.txt > > and the patch that produces is > > http://www.kegel.com/linux-2.5.63-bk5-spell.patch.bz2.bin > > The perl script took about an hour of 450MHz cpu time. > > (Might be worth adding a quick path to detect and skip > > files with none of the misspelled words. Or just run > > on a fast machine...) > > OK. Next Take. > > Changes this time: > - A bug-fix for "--dir" (Would have checked all files) > - Added a "fast-path" but this doesn't seem to make a difference > > New options: > - "--[no]fix" to fix (default) or only look for errors. > (This ignores the '[no]comment'-option and looks for all errors!) > - "--[no]override" to override(default) the original file or create a > "<filename>.fixed"-file > > > Anyone wants a "--[no]ask"-option?
Earlier or later the "missing-attachment"-thing must happen to anyone. :-)
Bis denn
-- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
[unhandled content-type:application/x-perl] | |