Messages in this thread | | | From | David Woodhouse <> | Date | 02 Mar 2003 14:55:08 +0000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kernel source spellchecker |
| |
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 13:49, Steven Cole wrote:
> > It might also be worth adding a list of 'suspect' spellings -- which > > require human intervention.
> In my first pass through the tree, it looks like there are quite a few > _correct_ uses of errata, but there indeed some of these: > > ./drivers/net/tulip/de2104x.c: /* Avoid a chip errata by prefixing a dummy entry. */ > > I think the errata/erratum issue requires careful editing.
Indeed -- that's my point. It's 'suspect' but not necessarily wrong. Likewise 'indexes' which can be permissible too, when used as a verb, but is more likely to just be a thinko for 'indices'.
-- dwmw2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |