Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] remove DEVFS_FL_AUTO_DEVNUM | Date | 2 Mar 2003 12:16:39 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <20030301190724.B1900@lst.de> By author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Rationale: while dynamic major/minors are a good idea, devfs is the > wrong layer to do it because all code relying on it would break with > out devfs. >
Your first clause here is a *highly* questionable statement...
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: cris ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |