Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 Mar 2003 00:29:27 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 |
| |
Andrew Morton (AM) writes: AM> Nope. What we're trying to measure here is pure in-memory lock AM> contention, locked bus traffic, context switches, etc, etc. To AM> do that we need to get the IO system out of the picture.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:16:10AM +0300, Alex Tomas wrote: > I simple use own pretty simple test. btw, you may disable preallocation > to increase allocation rate
This looks very interesting, but it may have to wait ca. 24 hours for some benchmark time b/c of the long boot times and late hour in .us.
This also looks like it would be a much better stress test, and the NUMA-Q is known for bringing out many rare races. There is are good reasons to run this test even aside from performance.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |