![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi! > I remember that discussion. It was pretty interesting, but some > conflicting ideas about what should be done; and not much organization > to it all. > > I've taken a lot of stuff from that wish list, combined it with what I gathered > from Larry's earlier post, and from Petr Baudis' recent post, and elsewhere, > and organized it into something that might be interesting. If anyone would > like to host this document on the web, please let me know. I'd like to host it in bitbucket CVS. If you have sf account, I'll just add you as a developer. > 2.1 Tagging > > It must be trivial for a developer to tag a file as part of a given > changeset. > > It must be possible to reorganize changesets, so that a given changeset may > be split up into more manageable pieces. > What does this have to do with tagging? > 3. Problems For Clarification > > If a file is tagged as being part of two different changesets, then changes > to that file should be associated with which changeset??? > Perhaps tagging should be explained? I thought that tagging is assigning symbolic name to some release? Pavel -- Pavel Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||