[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Never ever use word BitKeeper if Larry does not like you
    Hi Larry,

    On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 15:14, Larry McVoy wrote:

    > Let's try a little simple substitution since you seem to be needing coffee
    > this morning:
    > "Red Cap: a proprietary Red Hat clone"
    > "The goal of this system is to produce a system compatible with Red Hat"
    > Go run those statements by your lawyers, Alan, and then please report
    > what they said back here.

    I just did, and they said just what I'd expect from common sense. A
    compatibility claim is, in principle, just fine.

    Specifically, any attempt to pass off something that didn't come from
    Red Hat as an official Red Hat product was verboten; but

    I would distinguish this from someone who is promoting their own
    product, let's call it BillyBob's Linux, and who makes a claim
    that it is "compatible with Red Hat Linux." So long as the
    compatibility statement is not used prominently in the
    advertising of the product and so long as the statement is, in
    fact, true, this would likely constitute a fair use of our mark,
    roughly along the lines of comparative advertising.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.022 / U:10.160 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site