lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
DateSun, 9 Feb 2003 03:56:50 -0800
FromRoland McGrath <>
SubjectRe: heavy handed exit() in latest BK
>  - a read_lock(&tasklist_lock) is missing around the group_send_sig_info()
>    in send_sig_info().

Indeed.  I still intend to clean up those entry points and haven't gotten
to it, so I hadn't bothered with this yet either (though I think I sent it
to you for the backport).  It certainly does bite in practice, e.g. SIGPIPE.

There is a similar failure to take the lock before using zap_other_threads.
I thought I sent this patch before, but it's not in 2.5 yet.

--- /home/roland/redhat/linux-2.5.59-1.1007/fs/exec.c.~1~	Fri Feb  7 20:04:27 2003
+++ /home/roland/redhat/linux-2.5.59-1.1007/fs/exec.c	Sun Feb  9 03:43:36 2003
@@ -601,9 +601,12 @@ static inline int de_thread(struct task_
 
 	if (thread_group_empty(current))
 		goto no_thread_group;
+
 	/*
-	 * Kill all other threads in the thread group:
+	 * Kill all other threads in the thread group.
+	 * We must hold tasklist_lock to call zap_other_threads.
 	 */
+	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	spin_lock_irq(lock);
 	if (oldsig->group_exit) {
 		/*
@@ -611,6 +614,7 @@ static inline int de_thread(struct task_
 		 * return so that the signal is processed.
 		 */
 		spin_unlock_irq(lock);
+		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 		kmem_cache_free(sighand_cachep, newsighand);
 		if (newsig)
 			kmem_cache_free(signal_cachep, newsig);
@@ -629,12 +633,15 @@ static inline int de_thread(struct task_
 		oldsig->group_exit_task = current;
 		current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
 		spin_unlock_irq(lock);
+		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 		schedule();
+		read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 		spin_lock_irq(lock);
 		if (oldsig->group_exit_task)
 			BUG();
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(lock);
+	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * At this point all other threads have exited, all we have to

>  - session-IDs and group-IDs are set outside the tasklist lock. This
>    causes breakage in the USB code. The correct fix is to do this:

This is outside the part of the code that I've touched lately.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2008