lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Kexec, DMA, and SMP
Eric W. Biederman wrote:

>Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> writes:
>
>
>>Eric,
>>
>>I saw that you are working on kexec. I'm using and have hacked on a similar
>>piece of software named bootimg (and I'll be glad when yours is done and ready
>>and we can jettison bootimg). From the looks of the code, it looks like you
>>have seen bootimg, too. I looked through your patch, and I noticed a few
>>things. Hopefully it's the newest version of the patch.
>>
>>First was that you don't turn of DMA bus masters. There seemed to be some
>>discussion of this on lkml, but I didn't see anything in the patch for it. We
>>are actually having problems with bootimg and DMA bus master devices, so the
>>problem is real. And turning of DMA bus mastering for everything on the PCI bus
>>didn't seem to work, Ken Sumrall tried it, and at least the device in question
>>(a bcm5700) seemed to ignore the bit. We are looking at adding an ioctl or a
>>notifier list that will allow devices to register non-blocking calls to shut off
>>DMA. Is anything like that under consideration, or are you thinking of using
>>the reboot notifier for this, or what?
>>
>>
>
>The reboot notifier + device->shutdown(), are called. As you have noted
>the problem is not as easy as clearing the bus master bit, so I leave it
>up to the device driver. The device driver is responsible for placing
>the device into a quiescent state.
>
>Generally that code is present in the driver somewhere already, as it
>is needed for the rmmod case.
>
>In addition going through the normal shutdown path, downing interfaces
>etc, usually helps as well.
>
>So for when kexec is not used in a panic case this is easy.
>
The panic case is actually the most interesting for us. We are using
bootimg with the MCL coredump to take a kernel core to memory and pick
it up on the next boot. You cannot call most shutdown() functions from
a panic, since they will block.

>>The patch doesn't make sure it is running on processor zero for SMP machines.
>>You must do this on x86 machines, the kernel assumes it comes up on processor
>>zero. I assume this is true for other machines, too.
>>
>>
>
>I have a secondary patch. kexec-hwfixes, that does this. I am I need to review
>it a little closer and make certain the code is clean enough to go into
>the general purpose kernel. But I do have the code.
>
I have code that does this for bootimg, too, if you are interested, and
it has received extensive testing.

>>Hopefully I'm not looking at an old version of the patch, but these are
>>important things you need to handle.
>>
>>
>
>Yep. I am a little scatter brained on the maintenance side but I am handling
>them all.
>
>If you are after the kexec on panic case that is much, more
>interesting because it is quite possible we cannot afford to call some
>of those functions. But I am quite willing to discuss and work with
>people on what is really going on.
>
>For any more conversation though can we please cc linux-kernel?
>
>I like to keep things public so I don't have to answer the same
>question too many times.
>
No problem. As you have requested, lkml is copied.

Thanks,

-Corey

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.579 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site