![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Greg KH wrote: > > There should be no real difference as I'd like to integrate Kai's patch too. > > Ok, I'm confused, you're advocating putting back the old modutils > interface, but somehow not using the old modutils code? I don't > understand. No, I'm advocating to break as little as possible. I'm certainly willing to port any interesting feature from Rusty's patches. If one feature requires changes to modutils, that's fine. > Neither one of those proposals, no any others, were backed with working > examples. Rusty had the only working example of getting rid of the > userspace knowledge of the kernel data structures that I know of so far. 1. In the past I posted enough example code, which was pretty much ignored, why should I think it would be any different this time? 2. Is hotplug that broken, that it wouldn't survive 2.6, so it required a complete new implementation? If that should be case I herewith volunteer to add module alias support to modutils. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||