Messages in this thread | | | From | (David Wagner) | Subject | Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59 | Date | 6 Feb 2003 17:16:39 GMT |
| |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: >Well, selinux is still far from a mergeable shape and even needed additional >patches to the LSM tree last time I checked. This think of submitting hooks >for code that obviously isn't even intende to be merged in mainline is what >I really dislike, and it's the root for many problems with LSM.
You keep bringing up SELinux. Maybe you dislike SELinux; I don't know. In any case, LSM is not there just to support SELinux. It's intended to support a broad range of security modules and security policies. LSM is bigger than just SELinux. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |