lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
    From
    Date
    Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> writes:

    |> I am damn sure that if you compile with less sadistic alignment
    |> you will get smaller *and* faster kernel.

    So why don't you try it out? GCC offers everything you need for this
    experiment.

    Andreas.

    --
    Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
    SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
    Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
    "And now for something completely different."
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.019 / U:90.884 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site