Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 05 Feb 2003 15:22:32 -0800 | From | Samuel Flory <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.21pre4aa1 |
| |
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:12:03PM -0800, Samuel Flory wrote: > > >>Is the dac960 compile still broken? Or did it break again? >> >>make[3]: Entering directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers/block' >>gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/include -Wall >>-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common >>-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 >>-nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=DAC960 -DEXPORT_SYMTAB >>-c DAC960.c >>DAC960.c: In function `DAC960_ProcessCompletedBuffer': >>DAC960.c:3029: warning: passing arg 1 of `blk_finished_io' makes pointer >>from integer without a cast >>DAC960.c:3029: too few arguments to function `blk_finished_io' >>make[3]: *** [DAC960.o] Error 1 >>make[3]: Leaving directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers/block' >>make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 >>make[2]: Leaving directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers/block' >>make[1]: *** [_subdir_block] Error 2 >>make[1]: Leaving directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers' >>make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2 >> >> > >It was supposed to be fixed I need to re-check.. (I usually don't >compile it so I didn't notice sorry) > >
Just wondering it looked familar. I think I've got the patch someone posted a while back.
-- There is no such thing as obsolete hardware. Merely hardware that other people don't want. (The Second Rule of Hardware Acquisition) Sam Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |