Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 05 Feb 2003 14:14:55 -0800 | From | Samuel Flory <> | Subject | Re: Cerberus |
| |
Paul Larson wrote:
>I saw a comment late last week that someone was seeing cerberus crash >instantaneously with 2.5 on UP machines, so I decided to try to >reproduce this problem. I got the latest version of ceerbuerus and put >it on a single processor pIII-866 256MB ram, linux-2.5.59 kernel. >Newburn has been running for just under 5 days now without so much as a >hiccup. > >1. Has anyone had first hand experience with this instability? > >2. If so, were you just running the default newburn, or something else? >Please let me know if you did something different that caused it to >crash. > >
I've run Cerberus on a number of smp 2.5 kernels without issue. You might try "./newburn -t -p 2". Remember that you can fine tune your test by editing the newburn.tcf file.
-- There is no such thing as obsolete hardware. Merely hardware that other people don't want. (The Second Rule of Hardware Acquisition) Sam Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |