Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:33:16 -0800 | | From | Andrew Morton <> | | Subject | Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c |
| |
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:09:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > it might be simply an error in the tarball, maybe Linus's tree isn't in > > > full sync with bk head. But something definitely is corrupt between > > > tarball and bk. > > > > Well, the 2.5.59 BK tree shows that function using block_truncate_page() as > > well. > > > > The question is why did the Jan 9 changeset in the 2.5.55 timeframe not > > appear in the tree until post-2.5.59. Maybe on Jan 9 Linus only part-merged > > it by some means (making the web interface claim it is there), and this week > > completed the merge and updated the checkin comment? > > I don't know how it is supposed to work, but this sounds quite messy, if > this is the case, how can you order the changesets? >
Dave says that the Jan 9 date was when he committed it locally. It was pushed to Linus this week, and the tracking shows Dave's date, not Linus's.
I didn't know Dave was using bitkeeper. Sorry noise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |