lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c
    Date
    On Wednesday 05 February 2003 14:10, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 02:04:21PM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
    > > The change from block_truncate_page to nobh_truncate_page was done
    > > in Changeset 1.879.43.1. This was created on January 9th, but not
    > > merged into Linus' tree until Monday, so it is not in 2.5.59. I
    > > think the
    >
    > if you think it's normal the thing sounds very messy. I mean, how can
    > a changeset be numbered 1.879.43.1 and not be included in 2.5.59?
    >
    > The way I understood it is that when Linus merges "stuff", this
    > "stuff" gets a changeset number in the future, not in the past. No
    > matter if the "stuff" was created in the past. Is this the case or
    > not?

    I don't understand the changeset numbering myself, so I guess Larry will
    have to answer this one.

    > I mean, somehow there must be a way to number the changesets so that
    > applying them in order generates something coherent.
    >
    > Andrea

    --
    David Kleikamp
    IBM Linux Technology Center

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean