lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
Date
> >There is also tcc (http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/tcc/)
> >It claims to support gcc-like inline assembler, appears to be much
> >smaller and faster than gcc. Plus it is GPL so the liscense isn't a
> >problem either.
> >Though, I am not really sure of the quality of code generated or of how
> >mature it is.
>
> tcc is interesting. The code generation is pretty simplistic (read:
> trivially horrible for most things), but it sure is fast and small. And
> judging by the changelog, Fabrice is trying to compile the kernel with
> it.
>
> For a lot of problems, small-and-fast is good.

Maybe otcc is a better choice, then?

http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/otcc/

:-)

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.125 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site