[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
    > >There is also tcc (
    > >It claims to support gcc-like inline assembler, appears to be much
    > >smaller and faster than gcc. Plus it is GPL so the liscense isn't a
    > >problem either.
    > >Though, I am not really sure of the quality of code generated or of how
    > >mature it is.
    > tcc is interesting. The code generation is pretty simplistic (read:
    > trivially horrible for most things), but it sure is fast and small. And
    > judging by the changelog, Fabrice is trying to compile the kernel with
    > it.
    > For a lot of problems, small-and-fast is good.

    Maybe otcc is a better choice, then?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.034 / U:5.996 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site