[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
> >There is also tcc (
> >It claims to support gcc-like inline assembler, appears to be much
> >smaller and faster than gcc. Plus it is GPL so the liscense isn't a
> >problem either.
> >Though, I am not really sure of the quality of code generated or of how
> >mature it is.
> tcc is interesting. The code generation is pretty simplistic (read:
> trivially horrible for most things), but it sure is fast and small. And
> judging by the changelog, Fabrice is trying to compile the kernel with
> it.
> For a lot of problems, small-and-fast is good.

Maybe otcc is a better choice, then?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean