Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: PnP model | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 04 Feb 2003 22:56:34 +0000 |
| |
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 19:53, Grover, Andrew wrote: > Ok fair enough. But I think the drivers should always think things are > handled in a PnP manner, even if they really aren't. ;-) For example,
If this was a post 2.6 argument I would agree. The notion of removing all the horribly resource code and having ISA legacy drivers probe code do
my_dev = isa_create_device(&resourceinfo, "soundblaster16"); my_dev->set_irq = foo;
etc type stuff is nice
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |