Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | 26 Feb 2003 01:46:02 -0700 |
| |
David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> writes:
> >>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 00:07:50 -0800 (PST), David Lang > <david.lang@digitalinsight.com> said: > > > David.L> Garrit, you missed the preior posters point. IA64 had the > David.L> same fundamental problem as the Alpha, PPC, and Sparc > David.L> processors, it doesn't run x86 binaries. > > This simply isn't true. Itanium and Itanium 2 have full x86 hardware > built into the chip (for better or worse ;-). The speed isn't as good > as the fastest x86 chips today, but it's faster (~300MHz P6) than the > PCs many of us are using and it certainly meets my needs better than > any other x86 "emulation" I have used in the past (which includes > FX!32 and its relatives for Alpha).
I have various random x86 binaries that do not work.
My 32bit x86 user space does not run.
A 32bit kernel doesn't have a chance.
So for me at least the 32bit support is not useful in avoiding converting binaries. For the handful of apps that cannot be recompiled I suspect the support is good enough so you can get them to run somehow.
Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |