[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: VM problems in 2.4.20
    On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
    > On Wednesday 26 February 2003 20:40, Adam McKenna wrote:
    > Hi Adam,
    > > I'm having a VM issue on one of my servers running 2.4.20.
    > well, the vanilla VM, hmm, sorry: sucks :) for large boxen.

    Can you expand on "sucks"? 4GB is not really that large of a system anymore.

    I still don't see how this memory taken up by buffers/cache is not freed when
    a system process needs it. I have always thought that this type of memory is
    by definition "lower priority", and should be dropped when a process needs
    more memory. Is this not the case?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.020 / U:162.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site