lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
    On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:28:30PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
    >> _If_ it harms performance on small boxes.

    On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:19:56PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
    > You mean like the general slowdown from 2.4 - >2.5?
    > It seems to me for small boxes, 2.5.x is margianlly slower at most
    > things than 2.4.x.
    > I'm hoping and the code solidifes and things are tuned this gap will
    > go away and 2.5.x will inch ahead... hoping....

    Could you help identify the regressions? Profiles? Workload?

    On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:28:30PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
    >> The definitive Linux box appears to be $199 from Walmart right now,
    >> and its not SMP.

    On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:19:56PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
    > In two year this kind of hardware probably will be SMP (HT or some

    I'm a programmer not an economist (despite utility functions and Nash
    equilibria). Don't tell me what's definitive, give me some profiles.

    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.020 / U:306.444 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site