![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 07:24:24PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> So whole stole the remaining 1.85 seconds? Looks like pte_highmem. On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 06:17:27PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > would you mind to add the line for 2.4.21-pre4aa3? it has pte-highmem so > you can easily find it out for sure if it is pte_highmem that stole >10% > of your fast cpu. A line for the 2.4-rmap patch would be also > interesting. On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 07:24:24PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> Note one second spent in pte_alloc_one(). On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 06:17:27PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > note the seconds spent in the rmap affected paths too. The pagetable cache is gone in 2.5, so pte_alloc_one() takes the bitblitting hit for pagetables. I didn't catch the whole profile, so I'll need numbers for rmap paths. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||