Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Feb 2003 08:00:15 +0100 (CET) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: doublefault debugging (was Re: Linux v2.5.62 --- spontaneous reboots) |
| |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > if possible i'd avoid putting more overhead into the scheduler - it's > > clearly more performance-sensitive than the task create/exit path. > > This is a single non-serializing bit test, and if it means that the task > counters are _right_, that's definitely the right thing to do.
ok. Plus the wait_task_inactive() stuff was always a bit volatile. Now we could in fact remove it from release_task(), right?
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |