lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.5.x, 2.4.x ...] very small
    On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:25:17PM +0100, javaman wrote:
    > A very small patch (my first patch :-) for Documentation/spinlocks.txt:
    > it replace "IFF" with "IF" ;-)
    >
    > bye,
    > Paolo
    >
    > --- Documentation/spinlocks.txt.orig Fri Feb 21 15:02:01 2003
    > +++ Documentation/spinlocks.txt Fri Feb 21 15:02:44 2003
    > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
    >
    > If you have a case where you have to protect a data structure across
    > several CPU's and you want to use spinlocks you can potentially use
    > -cheaper versions of the spinlocks. IFF you know that the spinlocks are
    > +cheaper versions of the spinlocks. IF you know that the spinlocks are
    > never used in interrupt handlers, you can use the non-irq versions:
    >
    > spin_lock(&lock);
    >

    IFF is usually an abbreviation for "If and only if", not a typo.

    --
    Murray J. Root

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.022 / U:0.412 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site