![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 10:38:21AM +0000, John Bradford wrote: > > > Hiragana_Katakana was not defined before and I want to define a > > > keycode point. > > > When I saw 2.4.20 pc_keyb.c source, I found all keycode below 127 > > > was used, then there is no room. But the comment tell me I can use > > > 120-123, 125-127 with Japanese keyboard because these are not used > > > on JP89/109 keyboards. > > > (124 is, as you know, Yen key) THese are defined for a latin > > > keyboards. So I use 120. > > > > > > How do you think about it? > > > > In 2.4 you can, in 2.5 the 'as long as no duplication occurs for any > > single keyboard' is not valid anymore, and the keycode for > > hiragana/katakana is defined to be 183 I think. > > We assigned 182 to hiragana/katakana for set 3 in 2.5, and left 183 > undefined. Should we change the 2.5 keycode to 183? No - just bad memory on my side, it might as well be 183. ;) -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||