Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:09:35 +0100 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.62 |
| |
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:39:07AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > Hi, > > Finally, here's the klibc addition against the latest 2.5.62 bk kernel > tree.
A few comments that I had queued.
> usr/lib/arch/arm/MCONFIG | 26 Any good reasons for such a screaming name? makefile.config eventually.
> usr/lib/arch/arm/Makefile.inc | 31
No extension is used for arch/arm/Makefile Why does klibc differ in this respect? [An answer that tell me that arch/arm/Makefile should change is fine with me..]
> usr/lib/makeerrlist.pl | 80 > usr/lib/socketcalls.pl | 75
This mixture of code and scripts to generate code hursts my eye. What about usr/scripts/. I assume you do not want them in scripts/
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |