Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Synchronous signal delivery.. | From | James Antill <> | Date | 17 Feb 2003 18:34:39 -0500 |
| |
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> writes:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, James Antill wrote: > > > > I would personally like it a lot to have timer events available on > > > pollable fds. Am I alone in this ? > > > > Think of "timer events" as a single TCP connection, so you have... > > I'm sorry, I'm a bit confused. What's the point here ?
Just that although you could have each timer event on separate pollable fds it's much the same as having separate events for 1 byte, 2 bytes, and 4 bytes available on a network socket (Ie. you are much better off keeping that all in user space).
-- # James Antill -- james@and.org :0: * ^From: .*james@and\.org /dev/null - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |