![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, Feb 16 2003, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 08:51 pm, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 16 2003, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > Here are contest (http://contest.kolivas.org) results with osdl > > > (http://www.osdl.org) hardware for 2.5.61-mm1 with either the as i/o > > > scheduler or the cfq scheduler. > > > > > > io_load: > > > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > > > 2.5.60-mm1 3 112 67.0 15.7 7.1 1.42 > > > 2.5.61 2 143 52.4 32.9 13.3 1.81 > > > 2.5.61-mm1 2 634 12.5 257.3 24.6 7.83 > > > 2.5.61-mm1cfq 3 397 19.6 123.3 18.1 5.03 > > > > These loo fishy, could be some other interaction. I'm consistently > > beating 2.5.60-mm1/2.5.61 on io_load here, but that is 2.5.61 base and > > not 2.5.61-mm1 base. Could be something odd happening there. > > I dont think they're fishy - taken in the mm1 context -. I have tested cfq3a > without mm1 and it does beat the baseline. See a previous email I posted with > it. I didn't mean that you have done something fishy, but that there's a fishy interaction between -mm + CFQ :) -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||