[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: more signal locking bugs?
    > Ok, I committed this alternative change, which isn't quite as minimal, but 
    > looks a lot cleaner to me.
    > Also, looking at execve() and other paths, we do seem to have sufficient
    > protection from the tasklist_lock that signal delivery should be fine. So
    > despite a long and confused thread, I think in the end the only real bug
    > was the one Martin found which should be thus fixed..

    Ran your patch ... but I get plenty of these now:

    Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004
    printing eip:
    *pde = 2e10f001
    *pte = 00000000
    Oops: 0000
    CPU: 2
    EIP: 0060:[<c016d5a8>] Not tainted
    EFLAGS: 00010202
    EIP is at collect_sigign_sigcatch+0x1c/0x44
    eax: ed6d72c0 ebx: ed403f50 ecx: 00000004 edx: 00000001
    esi: ed403f48 edi: ed6d72c0 ebp: 00000000 esp: ed403eec
    ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
    Process ps (pid: 19988, threadinfo=ed402000 task=ed9352a0)
    Stack: c011d115 c02af820 c016dab8 ed6d72c0 ed403f48 ed403f50 ed6d72c0 edb99a50
    ed6d72c0 eebf33c0 ee225000 c034e400 ed403f50 ed403f48 00000000 52000000
    00008800 00000125 eebf33c0 eebf33e0 00000000 00000000 00000000 000000d0
    Call Trace:
    [<c011d115>] do_exit+0x30d/0x31c
    [<c016dab8>] proc_pid_stat+0x110/0x324
    [<c0130076>] __get_free_pages+0x4e/0x54
    [<c016b497>] proc_info_read+0x53/0x130
    [<c0145215>] vfs_read+0xa5/0x128
    [<c01454a2>] sys_read+0x2a/0x3c
    [<c0108b3f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

    Code: 8b 01 83 f8 01 75 08 8d 42 ff 0f ab 06 eb 0a 85 c0 74 06 8d

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.022 / U:0.088 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site